I just heard someone refers the concept of positive thinking as an irrational optimism. And then I realized how much the term has been abused (or not). I don't know how the masses understand "positive thinking" nowadays. But after a bit of contemplating, I think this is what the term really means (maybe it has been said, I don't know). Anyways, in my understanding, being positive is not equivalent to being optimistic. Being positive is to love. On the flip side, being negative is to fear. Some examples below:
Saturday, February 18, 2012
Thinking about "Positive Thinking"
I just heard someone refers the concept of positive thinking as an irrational optimism. And then I realized how much the term has been abused (or not). I don't know how the masses understand "positive thinking" nowadays. But after a bit of contemplating, I think this is what the term really means (maybe it has been said, I don't know). Anyways, in my understanding, being positive is not equivalent to being optimistic. Being positive is to love. On the flip side, being negative is to fear. Some examples below:
Friday, February 17, 2012
My Religion is Legit = Yours is Not?
Saying one religion is better than others is like saying a M-size shirt is better than a L-size shirt.
Wednesday, February 15, 2012
Thought
Where does it come from?
Could it be told with words?
If so, what is delivering those words?
Who is there to comprehend?
They say a picture is worth a thousand words.
But could a thousand pictures convey a thought?
Thoughts come in and out of my mind as they please. And I (if there's such a thing) am left speechless...
Could it be told with words?
If so, what is delivering those words?
Who is there to comprehend?
They say a picture is worth a thousand words.
But could a thousand pictures convey a thought?
Thoughts come in and out of my mind as they please. And I (if there's such a thing) am left speechless...
Wednesday, December 21, 2011
Introducing...Epicureanism—the Materialist
In this new series I'll be summarizing various religions and philosophical systems in the simplest way possible. It should be quick and easy to read allowing us to compare and contrast . I'll only focus on their views of the following aspects:
- Nature of the cosmos and our place within it
- God?
- Evil?
- How should we live?
First up, Epicureanism
Tuesday, December 20, 2011
Two Videos on Mirror Neurons
Just watch them; will ya?
The RSA Animate speaker talks about how we are able to associate ourselves as one family by bloodlines, to religions, to nation states, to nations; he seems to suggest that our sense of empathy has been expanding and progressing through time. I don't know if that is an accurate description. The sense of belonging is often caused by the discoveries of other bloodlines, religions, etc. We associate with our own bloodline, religion, race as one family only in the face of a common enemy. Therefore, I think our sense of empathy in the current stage largely sprung from the notion of otherization, the "us VS them" ideology. When do students in the same class see themselves as one? When they are competing with other class. I had this thought when I was watching the last Olympics. During the regular ATP tour (men's tennis), players represent themselves and there are no flags next to their names; win or lose, it's just another day in the office. However during the Olympics, all of a sudden it's Spain VS Swiss; and they're competing for the pride of their respective countries. We identify ourselves as different groups in different times. Sometimes, especially during the time of solitude, we do not even empathize with ourselves. I remember there were times where I would have conflicts within myself and it felt as if there were multiple selves inside me, fighting to become the authority.
The RSA Animate speaker talks about how we are able to associate ourselves as one family by bloodlines, to religions, to nation states, to nations; he seems to suggest that our sense of empathy has been expanding and progressing through time. I don't know if that is an accurate description. The sense of belonging is often caused by the discoveries of other bloodlines, religions, etc. We associate with our own bloodline, religion, race as one family only in the face of a common enemy. Therefore, I think our sense of empathy in the current stage largely sprung from the notion of otherization, the "us VS them" ideology. When do students in the same class see themselves as one? When they are competing with other class. I had this thought when I was watching the last Olympics. During the regular ATP tour (men's tennis), players represent themselves and there are no flags next to their names; win or lose, it's just another day in the office. However during the Olympics, all of a sudden it's Spain VS Swiss; and they're competing for the pride of their respective countries. We identify ourselves as different groups in different times. Sometimes, especially during the time of solitude, we do not even empathize with ourselves. I remember there were times where I would have conflicts within myself and it felt as if there were multiple selves inside me, fighting to become the authority.
Another circumstance that leads us see ourselves as one is in a time of extreme crisis. But it's relatively harder to bring about unity comparing to the "common enemy" circumstance because the threat of such crisis may not be as apparent and immediate.
The last thing I want to hear is the word "patriotic" being thrown around because that to me indicates a time of war or crisis.
It's certainly possible to see ourselves as one biosphere, but do we need an "other" or a catastrophic crisis as a precondition? I sincerely hope not. As the speaker of the RSA Animate puts it, we are softwired to be empathic. That to me suggests that we have a choice to be empathic or not. During a time of war or crisis, it's easier to choose the former. But to be empathic with everything there is during a time of peace almost seems impossible. The Buddha did it; Jesus did it as well; but can we?
Monday, September 19, 2011
About romantic relationship
A romantic relationship is not more special than say love between friends or mother's love of her children. Love is love. When you feel love, you feel complete. It does not matter if it's from a scenery, pet, iPhone, or sushi. Love is love. If anything, most marriages are nothing but misery because the couple thinks they have to stick with each other without knowing exactly why. Therefore, it seems as if you always have to sacrifice freedom for marriage. It's your marriage, you don't have to follow the rules made by god-knows-who. Create your own house rules and have fun. It's all made up anyways.
Friday, July 29, 2011
Bible = Truth? Depends on how you read it
When you read the Bible literally, it makes little to no sense. It's quite obvious shown by the examples below,
- God created everything in the universe in 6 days (148 hours)?!
- God created one sole couple, Adam and Eve, to populate the Earth?! (Meaning their children had to...)
- Snakes could talk?!
- In John 14:10, Jesus said "...I am in the Father, and that the Father is in me" (What?! How's that possible? It would make more sense if it's the mother, before he was born...)